How To Solve Tally Software Exception C000005

Flying Horses

Mylanta Good For Drinking Alcohol

qotd

keeping with the integration debate everywhere - Zygmunt Bauman suggests the analysis of the population into ethnic groups and minorities as an expression of the old ruling principle divide et impera :

"The powerful have to at all times the established principle of divide et impera operated if you feel threatened by the union of diverse, previously scattered complainant. felt if it is possible to prevent them that they are united in under whistleblowing suffering anxiety and anger when the various categories associated oppressed more songs separately to their needs, then can the protest in a variety of hostilities split up between the tribes and communities - communities where the leading powers then the role of the impartial judge, the keeper of the equal opportunity of competing claims, the apostle of peace, the Saviour and benevolent protector of all involved in the murderous conflict parties, and their contribution to the attainment of the conditions, that this conflict have been avoided, is then usually overlooked and forgotten. (...) If the poor fighting each other, the rich have reason to rejoice. "

Zygmunt Bauman. Communities, p. 126f. Suhrkamp 2009

Pickup Truck Best Fuel Economy

View from Spain

90% Hiv Acute Symptoms

qotd

Herbert Spencer's ideal society - eine von freien Individuen und so wenig Zwang wie möglich:

"That form of society towards which we are progrssing, I hold to be one in which government will be reduced to the smallest amount possible, and freedom increased to the greatest amount possible - one in which human nature will have become so moulded by social discipline into fitness for the social state, that it will need little external restraint, but will be self-restrained - one in which the citizen will tolerate no interference with his freedom, save that which maintains the equal freedom of others - one in which the spontaneous co-operation which has developed our industrial system, and is now developing it with increasing rapidity, will procude agencies for the discarge of nearly all social functions, and will leave to the primary governmental agency nothing beyond the function of Maintaining those conditions to free action, Which make apontaneous seeking co-operation possible - one # in which individual life will be pusehd Thus to the greatest extent consistent with social . life: and # in which social life will have no other end than to maintain the Complete sphere for individual life "

Herbert Spencer, Essays, Volume III, p. 72-73

Free Mario Salieri Film Streaming

qotd

Bertrand de Jouvenel - the end of the restriction of power by the objective pursued by it (and thus the legitimacy of civil disobedience) - and as the target nciht suddenly more power was used but power limiting Expanding:

"The idea of the end, after having played in medieval Catholic thought the part of a correctie to the idea of sovereignty (the obedience due to a Power by reason of its legitimacy could, that is to say, be disclaimed if the Power stopped aiming at the common good), suffered eclipse in the theories of popular sovereignty. (...) the hypothesis was made that a Power which was the legitimate emanation of society would for that very reason never cease to seek the social good, because "the General Will is always righteous and always aims at the public advantage".
In the nineteenth century (...) the idea of the end reappears, but its influence then is quite different from that which it exercised in the Middle Ages. In those days it had, in effect, served as on obstacle to the developtment of Power. But in the nineteenth century it will be seen Furthering its developtment. This reversal is related to at entirely new way of picturing society, Which is now regarded not as in aggregate of individuals with common principles, but as a developing organism. "

Bertrand de Jouvenel. On Power, p. 48f. Liberty Fund , 1992

Funny Wedding Invitation Text For Sister Marraige

qotd

a little longer: to Aristotle, the proletariat and the end of the property - mind is the following text portion of 1950

"If we offer the proletariat no real change in his work and life form and! it is not really free from his Proletarität, it is only natural that he with the utmost clarity, the uncertainty felt his root-and reserve-non-existence and increasingly urgent calls for compensation in the form that he is accustomed to being alone yet sicthtbar under these circumstances: in the form of mechanized mass care, leveling incomes through taxation, the highest wages and shortest working hours, the longest possible vacation udn the ruthless exploitation of the power of the naked number

What is going on then, Aristotle has been recognized in its 'politics' with all the clarity. He says that once the middle class in a democracy is too narrow, as the poorest of the now most numerous threaten to abuse their power. Translated into the language of our time, said this law of Aristotle's: the growing proletarianization means decreasing resistance to a policy of income smoothing and the further destruction of the middle class. More specifically: has the proletarianization exceeded a certain level, then run the claims that will put the proletariat in the rest of society, easy-to such a pressure on the Treasury and the monetary and credit system, that constant inflation pressure and positive tax less and less avoidable be. In the modern proletarian, the welfare state 'with its almost limitless programs, social security' and the , Full employment 'is increasingly prominent one fortgesertzte tendency to inflation (along with the permanent reduction in the purchasing power of money) and a fiscal policy that discourages them to own property to enjoy the fruits of the property and even to earn an income that formation of property allowed. While this trend discourages individual savings, can be the engine of state-organized society, more and more people, more or less adequate, stable feeding be 'left to fall through the state to tenants of the government. Bread and circuses: the history of the world has ever experienced a similar process "

Wilhelm. Roepke. The proletarian society. "The month", born in 1950

I Like Genital Tattoos

I Build My Dreams On Sand...6000Miles Away

Play Pples To Apples Online

because it's so beautiful

each humanities scholar who is trying to express trivial as complicated as possible, was an article by Karl Popper, entitled "Against the big words" written in the record book. Popper formulated it as a radical critique of the foreign words before only as dripping box sets of the members of the Frankfurt School are on closer inspection, meaningless phrases.

Recommended Reading:
http://www.zeit.de/1971/39/Wider-die-grossen-Worte?page=1

What Is The Best Material To Wear When Hiking

Vienna-election: Why democracy leads

Aristotle would have wondered the outcome of the election less than all the victims, who today just Boom have, and the mass is simple and can be captured by demagogues, when you are in a democracy to power. But at this point was cited by the Walter Vogelweide:

The people are stupid, that makes the cabbage, he puffs up just under the apron. However, he lets his head hollow. Sun prevails in the empire, I say: the good, political farting.

Who wants democracy may wudnern not change when demagogues (and also the representatives of other parties such) the power gain and thereby proceed with unfair means - that is democracy written into the genetic trait. So in practice less concern than deal with the fact that there are fewer voters than the bad democracy itself, the HC Strache & Co. is influence.

Hmong Clothes For Sale

monogamy is against nature?

this question is a new book called "Sex at Dawn. Why Monogamy goes against Nature" .

The authors Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jetha put it on the theory that monogamy is a recent phenomenon of human history that is not compatible with our investment.
draw the conclusion that we consider the conventional patterns of relationships, at least critically, if not even need to think - as rigid sexual morality against human nature is.
be because people from a biological perspective simply not created for it to maintain lifelong, monogamous partnerships.
On the basis of physiological, archaeological, anthropological (from pre-agricultural tribes around the world) findings as well as those that deal with primates, they draw the conclusion that monogamy and nuclear family is more recent phenomena in human history, thought of as the most and no more "natural", than most of us.

One argument is about, that people lived before the operation of agriculture in a much less sexually all-consuming culture in which there were no life-long partnerships. Also, would the bonobos, our closest relatives, who live in egalitarian and peaceful groups, by an astronomical number of sexual contacts distinguished, indicating that such behavior is more our nature.

note the difference to a earlier post, in which the "monogamy gene" was mentioned - Louann Brizendine has, as written in the earlier post, described the bonobos as animals, the length of the "monogamy gene" is associated with peacefulness and social behavior. This length corresponds to some extent that of the people. Anyone who has a longer gene, is a socially competent people. Yet, because according to Brizendine would bonobos but the Length of their monogamy gene (which is longer than in chimpanzees) on their social skills also faithful, monogamous creatures - at least faithful and monogamous than chimpanzees - his and everyone who has seen even a documentary about bonobos, knows that this is not so. Brizendine is also assumed that the bonobos 'monogamy gene' socially competent and peaceful power, but ultimately not true.
This is reflected in the adventurous interpretation of the behavior of bonobos, are on what shaky ground the arguments from the natural slope to polygamy.

shows from these two contradictory assumptions on the same subject, therefore, that the thing is just so simple and we just nciht be little by our genes to polygamy "forced" as illustrated by our nature. On the other hand, both authors come to the same conclusion - polygamy is natural behavior, they differ only in whether all, or only for those that have the specific gene of appropriate length. pay

Who Has Slept With Traci Bingham

general tuition fees - now also in Switzerland

not see anyone who wants to be

In Germany, they are already in Switzerland, it seems only be a matter of time. He speaks of the "general license fee". Behind shameless forced happiness lies with national television and, consequently, their costs, even from those who do not stop that either the TV viewing oppose completely or have found one of the holes to consume only free television. For the sake of simplicity, each household must be simple - pay, bringing the final Ladies and gentlemen, the anläuten on behalf of the sender in the best Stasi-style with the people to ask if you own a television, probably soon on - TV or not Labour Office shall find. For this question is also in Switzerland, where the National Council and Federal Council voted accordingly, now obsolete.

It is an obvious injustice to ask people to self-fund, called the no TV you own, those who, under any circumstances, the state television can benefit from it, must nevertheless pay.

goods (ie to contract, that a monopolist of necessary for everyday services that may prevent anyone else) the license fee before the general obligation to pay a perverse inverted to contract to the detriment of the individual, this blatant injustice now exacerbated.

The general license fee is symbolic of the turmoil of redistribution and bureaucracy, for it is in the state already long been customary to pay for innumerable that lands on the turmoil of the administration at corners, you do not know or never could take advantage. Now pay TV households for non-pay-TV State is thus ultimately only can be seen, be of what is already a common practice for decades. The only good thing about it: everyone can see (and understand with a little common sense, even), what remains of the sense of justice in the levying and spending of the money left over when you take the redistribution of the veil of confusion.

But such concerns are in a time of increasing (and therefore mostly private toll-free, and pay-tv is still based on a contract and any unilateral coercive) alternatives and decreasing rates of the formerly dominant state broadcaster little. Fewer viewers, weak program and thus less advertising revenue taste of the chronically inefficient and questionable quality, the viewer seems less and less low-reach stations.

So we decided instead to make the program more attractive or about to operate more efficiently, anywhere easy to expand the number of forced payers. They reason that though with flimsy arguments and traditional - objective reporting can only guarantee of public broadcasting, high-quality television is a merit good, which would provide the market does not, therefore, why one should help out. Recently, also popular in the field out, that was due to progress in the technology sector, state television easier than ever available and the general charges penalty was fair, therefore - a delicate argument, and the difficulty of ARD to withdraw ZDF, SRG, ORF that is followed by the difficulty of her post-fee cross-arm . escape

Or it is very obscure, estimated that all some of the democratic action of the state television had, because this is a third effect of which - as viewed in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung "in connection with the then upcoming general obligation to pay fees: ; "In addition, almost all the radio and would Television use, and the other benefited indirectly from the role that radio and television played in a democracy. " exclude

And since saving and state human memory by side, we simply decide the ever increasing cost of the transmitter with rising costs for the consumer to meet recently even non-users.

disappointing thing is that just as Switzerland, supposedly liberal country in the direction of general fees and forced dare follow the bad example of Germany. And although the Swiss State TV apparently (lt NZZ) even economically very good position. One might interpret the decision, a general penalty fees rather than pre-emptive safety measure to be able to leave the bureaucracy to continue to grow safely.

The surprise is that of all of Austria, known to be good at imitating Germany in terms of government growth, so now might be the last (in German) Bastion, where it - in theory - be possible to watch TV, without paying state TV to be allowed. But that should be given the developments in the two model countries only a matter of time and only due to the inertia of the legislature. Time to buy a TV?

http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/nationalrat_radio_fernsehen_gebuehren_1.7753698.html